The Expectables
Featuring Sylverster Stallone, Jason Statham, Wesley Snipes, Harrison Ford, Terry Crews, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Lorne Michaels, Dolph Lundgren, Kelsey Grammer, Judge Reinhold, Orson Welles, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, Sting, the entire starting lineup of the 1998 St. Louis Rams, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and Walt Disney's cryogenically frozen head!
The wonderful thing about The Expendables series is that no matter how far you lower your
expectations, it still finds a way to disappoint you. When I saw The Expendables 2 in theaters a couple
years ago (on an OKCupid date, no less) I hadn’t seen the original, but I knew
enough about the franchise to assume that it would be dopey, ‘roided out,
gratuitously violent fun. And I was right about everything except for the fun.
None of these action stars are particularly good actors, but
the old action movies they headlined were still great because they usually had a
supporting cast full of talented character actors to carry some of the
emotional weight of the story. The
Expendables movies, on the other hand, are so frontloaded with old action
stars that there’s no room for anybody who can really act, which is why much of
the space between shootouts in The
Expendables 2 is filled with closeups of stone faced old men growling
exposition at each other.
And the shootouts aren’t much better, because The Expendables 2 is a remarkably
inactive action movie. These movies are about a team of aging commandos who aren’t
too old to kick some ass – however, the team of aging actors playing them
actually sort of are too old to kick
some ass, which puts some restrictions on the sorts of stuff they can do on
camera. Clever editing and stuntmen do a lot of the work, but when the actual
stars of the movie are on camera they’re usually doing one of the following
four things:
1) Riding in cars, helicopters, tanks, etc shooting bad guys.
2) Standing still swapping one liners.
3) Standing still shooting bad guys.
4) Walking forward at a leisurely pace shooting bad guys.
But don't just take my word for it:
Sabba, the girl from OKCupid who I saw The Expendables 2 with, is now one of my main LA bros, and we made
a point of seeing The Expendables 3
this week to see how it stacked up. I, for one, was surprised at how not-bad it
was. I mean, don’t get me wrong – the movie is extremely bad. But it’s somewhat
less bad than The Expendables 2, and
that’s quite an improvement.
This time around, Sylvester Stallone and his team of gruff,
aging mercenaries are hot on the trail of Conrad Stonebanks, a former
Expendable who has since become an evil international arms dealer – because
guys with names like ‘Conrad Stonebanks’ seldom go on to become pediatricians
or real estate agents. When Stonebanks critically injures one of the
Expendables, Stallone dismisses the rest of his team for their own safety and
instead hires a bunch of new, young mercenaries with equally questionable
acting abilities to take Stonebanks down for good.
Like the previous films in the series, the plot exists at
the mercy of cameo appearances from pretty much every action star who had time
to visit the set. As the script lurches from cameo to cameo the movie takes on
a disjointed quality that feels more like watching a vacation video Sylvester
Stallone and Jason Statham shot while traveling around Bulgaria visiting old
friends: “Ey, this scene is from the day
Jet Li came to visit! Remember how much fun that was? There we are all standing
around shooting blanks at those Bulgarian non-union extras! Oh, Jet Li, that
guy’s a riot…”
In a movie with such a staggering number of celebrity cameos
it was pretty much a statistical certainty that at least a couple of them would
turn in good performances. Mel Gibson plays Stonebanks, a deranged, raving
lunatic who everyone hates, in a role it feels like he’s spent the last ten
years preparing for. Kelsey Grammer, who is inexplicably in this movie*, is a
much needed breath of charisma after 25 minutes of looking at Sylvester
Stallone’s shovel blade of a face. But it’s Antonio Banderas, playing a
flamboyant, overeager mercenary, who really saves the movie by not taking it
seriously and prancing his way through every scene.
*Here’s my biggest disappointment: They cast Kelsey Grammer,
a man famous not for action movies but for a 20 year career playing Dr. Frasier
Crane, in a movie where dialogue only serves to deliver references to other
actors’ work, and yet they didn’t make one
single fucking reference to either Cheers
or Frasier. I mean, what the hell, The Expendables 3? References are pretty
much the only thing you do well! All you had to do was have him say “…but what do I know – I’m not a
psychiatrist!”
It also helps that a number of these cast members are still
young enough to run around and deliver the occasional unassisted roundhouse
kick, which makes the action scenes considerably more engaging than they were
in the previous movie. The finale, in which Expendables young and old level an
apartment block and kill an entire country’s army, is actually pretty exciting
– and made all the more amusing by the fact that it takes place in a fictional
post-Soviet republic that I swear to God is actually called Assmanistan.
"Assman, Jerry! I'm Cosmo Kramer, The Assman!"
So yes, The
Expendables 3 is a bad movie, but it’s a much better bad movie than The Expendables 2. So why, then, does it
only have a 35% positive rating from review aggregator RottenTomatoes, compared
to The Expendables 2’s 65%? I’ve
given it some thought, and I think it really all comes back to expectations.
Even though it was heavily promoted as mindless, campy,
violent fun, I didn’t see the original Expendables.
It got bad reviews, but I figured those were just from uptight critics who
didn’t grow up with the movie Commando
the way I did. When The Expendables 2
came out, most people who went to see it had sufficiently lowered their
expectations after seeing the original Expendables,
whereas I went into it blind expecting a level of quality that wasn’t there –
so I was disappointed while everyone else was pleasantly surprised.
The only thing that can properly prepare you for the special
kind of smirking, self-congratulatory bad of an Expendables movie is another Expendables
movie. So having seen The Expendables 2,
and knowing that this franchise isn’t above bringing the entire story to a
grinding halt for ten minutes so Chuck Norris can make a Chuck Norris joke, I knew
going into 3 just how little
competent filmmaking I was in for and adjusted my expectations accordingly.
So here’s my advice if you want to see The Expendables 3 – do it, but only after renting another Expendables movie beforehand. If you don’t
warm up first, you could seriously hurt yourself.
Truman Capps would undoubtedly lose in a fight against any member of the Expendables cast, including the malnourished Bulgarian children who worked as extras in some of the village scenes.